HomeAgent FrameworksAmazon Bedrock マネージドナレッジベースでエージェント向けエンタープライズ検索を構築する

Amazon Bedrock マネージドナレッジベースでエージェント向けエンタープライズ検索を構築するBuild enterprise search for agents with Amazon Bedrock Managed Knowledge Base

AI2 点サマリSummary highlight
  • Amazon Bedrock のマネージドナレッジベースを活用し、AIエージェントが社内文書を横断検索できるエンタープライズ検索基盤の構築方法を解説。
  • RAGパターンの実装を簡素化し、エージェントの回答精度向上に貢献する。

This article explains how to use Amazon Bedrock Managed Knowledge Base to build enterprise search capabilities for AI agents, simplifying RAG-based retrieval over internal documents and improving agent response accuracy.

要約と収集メタデータをもとに生成した AI 解説本文です。元記事全文の転載・翻訳ではありません。This AI explainer is generated from the summaries and collected metadata, not from a reproduction or translation of the full source article.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) が、生成AIエージェントに社内文書を横断検索させるエンタープライズ検索基盤を、Amazon Bedrock のマネージドナレッジベースで構築する手法を公式ブログで解説した。検索拡張生成 (RAG) の実装を簡素化し、エージェントが根拠に基づいた回答を返せるようにする点が主眼だ。

背景には、大規模言語モデル (LLM) が抱える固有の制約がある。LLMは一般的な知識には強いものの、企業内の規程や製品仕様、最新のドキュメントといった非公開データは学習していないため、そのままでは正確に答えられない。この課題を補うのがRAGで、ユーザーの質問に関連する文書をあらかじめ検索し、その内容を回答生成時のコンテキストとして与える。これにより、根拠のない生成 (ハルシネーション) を抑えつつ、社内情報に即した応答が可能になる。

従来、RAGを自前で構築するには、文書の取り込みや適切な単位への分割 (チャンク化)、埋め込みベクトルへの変換、ベクトルデータベースへの格納と検索まで、多くの工程を個別に組み合わせる必要があった。マネージドナレッジベースは、これら一連の処理を統合的に扱い、Amazon S3 などに置いた文書を指定するだけで検索可能な状態に整える。ベクトルストアとしては Amazon OpenSearch Serverless などを利用でき、インフラ管理の負担を軽減できるとされる。

Amazon Bedrock のマネージドナレッジベースを活用し、AIエージェントが社内文書を横断検索できるエンタープライズ検索基盤の構築方法を解説。
🤖 Agent Frameworks · 本記事のポイント

エージェント活用の観点では、ナレッジベースをツールとして呼び出すことで、エージェントが必要に応じて社内知識を参照しながらタスクを進められる。AWSは自律的なワークフローを担うエージェント機能も提供しており、検索基盤と組み合わせることで、問い合わせ対応や社内ヘルプデスクといった業務への応用が見込まれる。

同種の取り組みは各社で進んでおり、Microsoft は Azure AI Search、Google は Vertex AI Search を通じて類似の検索・RAG機能を提供している。マネージド型サービスは開発を速める一方、検索精度やコスト、データの取り扱いは要件に応じた検証が求められる。エンタープライズ検索は生成AI活用の要となりつつあり、こうした基盤整備が実運用の鍵を握る可能性がある。

Amazon Bedrock's managed knowledge bases give organizations a way to connect AI agents to their own documents without building and operating the underlying search?q=retrieval&tag=retrieval&entry=7bcb83aefdfcab1c">retrieval infrastructure themselves. This matters because search?q=retrieval&tag=retrieval&entry=7bcb83aefdfcab1c">retrieval-augmented generation, or RAG, has become the default pattern for grounding large language model responses in trustworthy, up-to-date information, yet assembling the pieces manually—document ingestion, chunking, embedding, vector storage, and query orchestration—remains time-consuming and error-prone. A managed service that handles those steps lowers the barrier to putting enterprise search behind an agent.

At a high level, a knowledge base ingests source documents, splits them into chunks, converts each chunk into a vector embedding, and stores those vectors in a database that supports similarity search. When an agent receives a user question, the question is embedded and compared against the stored vectors to find the most relevant passages, which are then passed to the model as context. Bedrock exposes this through two main operations: a Retrieve API that returns matching passages, and a RetrieveAndGenerate API that both fetches passages and produces a synthesized answer with citations. Agents built on Bedrock can call a knowledge base as an action, so the search?q=retrieval&tag=retrieval&entry=7bcb83aefdfcab1c">retrieval step becomes part of the agent's reasoning loop rather than a separate system the developer has to wire together.

The service is designed to reduce operational overhead in several places. Data sources such as Amazon S3 can be connected directly, and Bedrock manages the embedding process using models like Amazon Titan Text Embeddings or third-party options available in the platform. For vector storage, it can provision and manage an index in Amazon OpenSearch Serverless, or connect to alternatives including Amazon Aurora with pgvector, Pinecone, Redis Enterprise Cloud, and MongoDB Atlas. Ingestion jobs can be re-run to keep the index synchronized as documents change, which addresses one of the harder maintenance problems in production RAG systems: preventing answers from drifting out of date.

search?q=retrieval&tag=retrieval&entry=7bcb83aefdfcab1c">Retrieval quality depends heavily on configuration, and the managed service surfaces several controls that experienced teams tend to tune. Chunking strategy—fixed size, semantic, or hierarchical—affects how well a passage captures a complete idea. Metadata filtering lets an agent restrict searches to documents a user is authorized to see or to a particular department, product line, or time range, which is often essential in enterprise settings. Hybrid search that combines semantic vectors with keyword matching can improve recall for queries containing exact terms such as part numbers or error codes, and reranking models can reorder candidate passages to push the most relevant results to the top before they reach the language model. These features do not eliminate the need for evaluation, but they give developers levers to improve accuracy without rebuilding the pipeline.

It is worth placing this within the broader competitive landscape. Managed RAG and enterprise search offerings have proliferated across major providers, with comparable capabilities appearing in services such as Google's Vertex AI Search and Microsoft's Azure AI Search, alongside a large ecosystem of open-source frameworks like LangChain and LlamaIndex that developers use to build custom pipelines. The trade-off is familiar: a managed service accelerates time to production and reduces the maintenance burden, while a hand-built stack offers finer control and portability. Organizations already invested in AWS may find the tighter integration with Bedrock agents, identity and access management, and existing S3 data lakes a practical advantage.

Several caveats apply. search?q=retrieval&tag=retrieval&entry=7bcb83aefdfcab1c">Retrieval grounding reduces but does not fully remove the risk of inaccurate or fabricated responses, so citations, human review, and evaluation datasets remain important for high-stakes use cases. Access control is a shared responsibility; ensuring that an agent only retrieves documents a given user is permitted to see typically requires careful metadata design and application-level enforcement. Costs accrue across embedding generation, vector storage, and model inference, and they can scale with document volume and query traffic, so capacity planning is advisable before a broad rollout.

For teams evaluating how to give agents reliable access to internal knowledge, the managed knowledge base approach appears to offer a pragmatic starting point. It abstracts much of the plumbing while leaving room to refine chunking, filtering, and ranking as requirements become clearer, and it fits naturally into agent architectures where search?q=retrieval&tag=retrieval&entry=7bcb83aefdfcab1c">retrieval is one of several tools the model can invoke during a task.

  • 出典SourceAWS Machine Learning Blog公式Official
  • 直近30件の平均重要度Avg importance, last 301=Info · 2=Medium · 3=High
  • 配信形式FormatブログBlog
  • 重要度Importance重要度 MediumMedium priority(Agent Frameworks 137件中、同等以上 137件)(137 of 137 Agent Frameworks entries are equal or higher)
  • 情報の寿命Half-life🏛️ 長期 (アーキテクチャ)Long-term (architecture)
  • 原文言語Source languageEN
  • 収集日時Collected2026/07/23 01:13

本ページの本文と要約は AI による自動生成です。日本語版と英語版は言語ごとに独立して生成されるため、表現や詳しさが異なる場合があります。正確性は元記事 (aws.amazon.com) をご確認ください。The body and summaries are AI-generated independently for each language, so wording and detail may differ. Verify accuracy at the original source (aws.amazon.com).

🤖Agent Frameworks の他の記事More from Agent Frameworksもっと見る →View more →